Quantcast
 
 


AMD Vishera FX-6300 & FX-4300 Review

Author: SKYMTL
Date: October 30, 2012
Product Name: FX-6300 & FX-4300
Part Number: FD6300WMHKBOX & FD4300WMHKBOX
Warranty: 3 Years
Share |

1080P Gaming Benchmarks


While lower resolution gaming highlights processor bottlenecks, most people use slightly higher resolution monitors and want to play with increased detail settings. In these situations, the CPU tends to take a back seat to the graphics processor but even at 1080P (ie: 1920x1080) a slower CPU can still have a drastic impact upon in-game performance. In order to illustrate this, we have carried over the games from our previous tests, pumped detail levels to their max and used the increasingly popular 1080P resolution standard.




RESULTS: As the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck, we can see that single thread CPU performance becomes less of a determining factor in overall framerates. While the FX-4300 and FX-6300 may not be able to quite reach the level of Intelís i3 3225, they put up a pretty good fight.
 
 
 

Latest Reviews in Processors
June 18, 2017
Intel's X299 platform has finally arrived and with it some unique new Core-X processors. In this review we go in-depth and test the Kaby Lake-X i-7740X's performance & overclocking abilities....
April 10, 2017
The Ryzen 5 1500X and 1600X may not look like the most impressive CPU's but some surprising benchmark numbers make their price to performance ratio one the best around, beating even the Ryzen 7 series...
March 30, 2017
The debate about ECC memory and Ryzen has been raging for the last few weeks. In this article we detail what you can expect right now for ECC compatibility on AMD's Ryzen processors....