AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB GHz Edition Review

Author: SKYMTL
Date: June 21, 2012
Product Name: HD 7970 GHz Edition
Share |

AMD’s Boost Feature Explained

Something you may not have been expecting in the specification chart was the addition of a Boost category. Taking a page out of NVIDIA’s playbook, AMD is now allowing the core to go above and beyond its rated “base clock” if built-in monitoring algorithms detect there is TDP overhead to be spared. This all occurs above standard P-States but the traditional PowerTune limits have also been increased in order to take advantage of dynamic voltage adjustments. As a result, the card should strive to hit the predetermined limit (in this case 50MHz higher than the reference spec) more often without the throttling that sometimes occurred when PowerTune clamped down on power draw.

While this technology is surely a welcome addition, it isn’t quite as dynamic as NVIDIA’s GPU Boost feature, nor does it give the wide dynamic clock range of Kepler-based products. Let’s explain this a bit further. Kepler cards use a hardware-based solution which samples the relative distance to maximum TDP at sub-second intervals. This allows for quick situational changes that ultimately lead to varying clock speeds and maximum performance. Granted, GPU Boost does cause some interesting overclocking adventures and is adversely affected by temperature increases but in our experience, it works very well.

AMD’s Boost on the other hand is quite lethargic and heavy handed in its approach since there seems to be very little clock adjustment granularity. It sets a clock speed (usually 1050MHz in the HD 7970 GHz Edition’s case) and for the most part stays there throughout a game. During our testing, there were a few instances where a step-down to 1GHz occurred but they were few and far between and we never saw an instance where the HD 7970 GHz Edition took advantage of lower temperatures. Even increasing the fan speed to 100% resulted in identical clock speeds, proving that AMD either strictly curtails their Boost frequency or the technology still has a long way to go. Nonetheless, we expect it to mature rapidly and become an integral part of AMD's future strategy.

Unfortunately, AMD hasn’t been forthcoming with any additional information and didn’t answer any of our Boost-related questions but hopefully they’ll be less tight lipped about it as time goes on.

Much like with Kepler-based cards, users will now be increasing the Boost Clock rather than the base frequency. However, overclocking still isn’t a “you see what you get” scenario since we experienced some instances where our set Boost overclock would default to a lower level. This happened in Wargame: European Conflict, Metro 2033 and Battlefield 3.

Latest Reviews in Video Cards
November 24, 2015
After finally getting some hands-on time with AMD's new Radeon Software Crimson, we have come to respect it in a big way.  Could this be the one thing that makes people rethink AMD's drivers?...
November 18, 2015
AMD's R9 380X is meant to fill the gap between the R9 380 and R9 390 but with prices ranging from $230 to $260, this new card will need great performance to differentiate itself....
November 12, 2015
They may be two very different cards at wildly separate ends of the price spectrum but AMD's R9 Nano and ASUS' GTX 970 Mini find themselves competing in the same ITX bracket. Is one really "better" th...