| ||
| by MAC | November 18, 2009 | ||
| Gaming Benchmarks Gaming BenchmarksFuturemark 3DMark063DMark06 v1.1.0 Graphic Settings: Default Resolution: 1280X1024 Test: Specific CPU Score and Full Run 3Dmarks Comparison: Generated Score The Futuremark 3DMark series has been a part of the backbone in computer and hardware reviews since its conception. The trend continues today as 3DMark06 provides consumers with a solid synthetic benchmark geared for performance and comparison in the 3D gaming realm. This remains one of the most sought after statistics, as well as an excellent tool for accurate CPU comparison, and it will undoubtedly be used for years to come. ![]() In 3DMark06, the Maximus III Formula was second only to the P7P55D Deluxe, and even then the difference is minimal. Futuremark 3DMark Vantage3DMark Vantage v1.0.1 Graphic Settings: Performance Preset Resolution: 1280X1024 Test: Specific CPU Score and Full Run 3Dmarks Comparison: Generated Score 3DMark Vantage is the follow-up to the highly successful 3DMark06. It uses DirectX 10 exclusively so if you are running Windows XP, you can forget about this benchmark. Along with being a very capable graphics card testing application, it also has very heavily multi-threaded CPU tests, such Physics Simulation and Artificial Intelligence (AI), which makes it a good all-around gaming benchmark. ![]() On the other hand, in Vantage, the MIIIF took the lead from the P7P55D. CrysisCrysis v1.21 Resolution: 1680x1050 Anti Aliasing: 0 Quality Settings: High Global Settings: DX10 / 64-Bit Test 1: Ice benchmark_CPU2 demo Comparison: FPS (Frames per Second) Still one of the most hardware intensive game on the market today, Crysis has been chosen for its obvious ability to be able to showcase the differences between platforms and to showcase just how far one will need to go in the quest for maximum performance. The game also features the renowned CryEngine, the power behind the incredible graphics, which is expected to be foundation of future titles. ![]() This is as reliable a benchmark as they come, and as you can see, the difference between all four motherboards is infinitesimal. Far Cry 2Far Cry 2 1.02 Resolution: 1680x1050 Anti Aliasing: 0 Quality Settings: Very High Global Settings: DX10 Enabled Test 1: Ranch Long Demo Comparison: FPS (Frames per Second) Far Cry 2 is the hot new new first-person shooter from Ubisoft's Montreal studio, and the first game to utilize the new visually stunning Dunia Engine, which will undoubtedly be used by numerous future games. Using the included Benchmarking Tool, we ran the Long Ranch demo in DX10 mode at 1680x1050 with all settings set to very high. ![]() As in Crysis, the frame rate difference between all the different models is really not worth mentioning. Left 4 DeadLeft 4 Dead (Latest Update) Resolution: 1680x1050 Filtering: 4X MSAA / Anisotropic 8X Graphic Settings: High Shader Detail: Very High Test 1: HWC Custom Timedemo Comparison: FPS (Frames per Second) Left 4 Dead is the latest disorienting, fast-paced zombie apocalypse mega-hit from Valve. L4D uses the latest version of the Source engine with enhancements such as multi-core processor support and physics-based animation. We test here at 1680x1050 with in-game details set to their highest levels, with MSAA 4X and AA 8X. For benching, we used a pre-recorded 20 minute timedemo taken on the No Mercy campaign during The Apartments mission. ![]() Both ASUS models put up some strong numbers in L4D, with the MIIIF coming in second behind the P7P55D Deluxe. Street Fighter 4Street Fighter 4 Demo Resolution: 1680x1050 Anti-Aliasing: 0X Graphic Settings: High Test 1: Built-in Timedemo Comparison: FPS (Frames per Second) Street Fighter IV is a 2008 arcade game produced by famous developer Capcom, that has finally been released on the PC platform. This game has not been 'ported' since the Street Fighter IV arcade machines actually have PC internals, with circa 2005 components. As a result, the version of the game released on the PC is considered the definitive version. With a fully multi-threaded engine and an astounding hybrid 2D/3D graphics style, this game is sure to please all fans of the Street Fighter series. ![]() The Maximus III Formula came in third here, but again, we are talking less than one FPS difference between the four boards. World in ConflictWorld in Conflict v1.010 Resolution: 1680x1050 Anti-Aliasing: 4X Anisotropic Filtering: 4X Graphic Settings: Very High Test 1: Built-in Benchmark Comparison: FPS (Frames per Second) One of the most visually stunning real-time strategy games in recent history, World in Conflict can really push systems to the brink, which is what we attempt by running the game in DirectX 10 mode at 1680x1050 with all settings maxed out. For this test we used the in-game benchmarking tool. ![]() The MIIIF arguably took the lead in WiC, but it's performance lead is minimal. Overall, when it comes to single graphics card gaming, none of the motherboards are really faster than the others, since the performance differences are less than 1% in most case. | ||
| |
| Latest Reviews in Motherboards | |||||||||
|