| ||
| by MAC | November 18, 2009 | ||
| System Benchmarks System BenchmarksSuperPi Mod v1.5 When running the SuperPI 32MB benchmark, we are calculating Pi to 32 million digits and timing the process. Obviously more CPU power helps in this intense calculation, but the memory sub-system also plays an important role, as does the operating system. We are running one instance of SuperPi via the HyperPi 0.99b interface. This is therefore a single-thread workload.  Flexing its enthusiast muscles, the Maximus III Formula took the crown in this ever popular benchmark, just squeaking by the P7P55D Deluxe. Cinebench R10Cinebench R10 64-bit Test1: Single CPU Image Render Test2: Multi CPU Image Render Comparison: Generated Score Developed by MAXON, creators of Cinema 4D, Cinebench 10 is designed using the popular Cinema software and created to compare system performance in 3D Animation and Photo applications. There are two parts to the test; the first stresses only the primary CPU or Core, the second, makes use of up to 16 CPUs/Cores. Both are done rendering a realistic photo while utilizing various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders  The performance differences in Cinebench are truly minimal, with the MIIIF coming in second in both tests. PCMark Vantage x64PCMark Vantage Advanced 64-bit Edition (1.0.0.0) PCMark Suite / Default Settings Comparison: Generated Score The main focus of our General Tasks category lies with the most recent installment of the PCMark series, Vantage. While still classified under the description of a Synthetic benchmark, PCMark Vantage uses many of Vista's (Note - Vantage is Vista-only) built-in programs and features along with its own tests, so it is "real-world" applicable in regards to CPU performance. The following is a general list of the tests in the PCMark suite, very much in line with tasks of an average user: Data encryption, Data compression, CPU image manipulation (compression/decompression/resize), Audio transcoding,Video transcoding,Text editing,Web page rendering, Windows Mail, Windows Contacts, and CPU game test.  Although a bit behind the P7P55D Deluxe, the MIIF definitely proves its superiority over the Intel and MSI boards. Photoshop CS4 For the image editing portion of this review, we will use Photoshop CS4 in coordination with Driver Heaven’s Photoshop Benchmark V3, which is an excellent test of CPU power and memory bandwidth. This is a scripted benchmark that individually applies 15 different filters to a 109MB JPEG, and uses Photoshop’s built-in timing feature to provide a result at each test stage. Then it’s simply a matter of adding up the 15 results to reach the final figure.  While the MIIIF comes in third, the difference between fastest and slowest board is only 1.5%. Lame Front End Lame Front End v1.0 is a single-threaded application, which means that it only utilizes a single processor core. This will obviously limit performance but it will allow us to see the benefits of Lynnfield aggressive Turbo Boost with single-threaded loads. We will be encoding a WAV rip of Santana’s Supernatural album and converting it to MP3 using the highest fidelity VBR 0 quality preset.  In LFE, the tables are turned with the Maximus III Formula coming in last, and the Intel board claiming its first minor victory. x264 HD Benchmarkx264 HD Benchmark v1.0 Test: MPEG-2 HD 720P Video Clip Conversion to x264 DVD Video Length: 30 Seconds Comparison: FPS of Second Pass x264 is quickly becoming the new codec of choice for encoding a growing number of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC videos. Think of it as the new Divx of HD and you can understand why we felt it critical to include. Tech Arp's recent development of the x264 HD Benchmark takes a 30 second HD video clip and encodes it into the x264 codec with the intention of little to no quality loss. The test is measured using the average frames per second achieved during encoding, which scales with processor speed and efficiency. The benchmark also allows the use of multi-core processors so it gives a very accurate depiction of what to expect when using encoding application on a typical full length video.  The MIIIF comes in first in this benchmark with the P7P55D right on its heels. Aside from the laggard DP55KG, all models are once again very equal performance-wise. WinRARWinRAR 3.8.0 Test: Compression of 1GB of Assorted Files Comparison: Time to Finish One of the most popular file compression/decompresion tools, we use WinRAR to compress a 1GB batch of files and archive them, timing the task until completion.  The MIIIF ties for the last with the DP55KG in WinRAR, but again we are talking about a 2 second/1% spread between all four models. Overall, the Maximus III Formula proved to be a very solid performance, often swapping the lead with the P7P55D Deluxe. Truthfully though, you'll never notice the performance difference between these four motherboards. | ||
| |
| Latest Reviews in Motherboards | |||||||||
|
