Interior Impressions
Interior Impressions
While packaging, accessories and even external looks is all well and fine; the proof is in the pudding as they say, so let’s pry the top off and peer inside to see what we can find.
Doing this is simplicity itself as the top of the case is held in place with only four ultra small screws. Be warned: removing these screws does nullify your warranty. At least Patriot is totally up front about this as you will have to cut not one but two “warranty void” stickers to get that lid off.
If you plan on doing this, please make sure you are grounded! Taking the top off may not ruin your SSD like it will a regular drive (unless you are in a clean room, in which case your spindle drive may just survive) but a errant static charge can and will fry your precious data into paper weight uselessness.
If you remember our first SSD review which centered around the
64GB G.Skill SLC SSD, the layout of the Warp is fairly similar. At one end you have your SATA power and data connectors, with the SSD controller chip and then two rows of four NAND MLC flash chips. Unlike the G. Skill, the other side of this PCB has another 8 chips soldered to that side of the board; making for a grand total of 1 controller chip and 16 NAND flash chips. In a very nice move, all 16 of these chips are from the same week (2008 week 37) and batch (YCGF62P1) and as such should have very similar characteristics. Doing this is actually like hand sorting your RAM chips to optimize their interoperability, and does make a slight difference as different batches will have slightly different performance characteristics. Was this just an accident or does Patriot specify this? We have no idea but seeing it in our Solid State Drive is reassuring to be sure.
The I/O controller chip shown above is, as expected, a JMicron model 602. This chip is SATA 2 capable controller which supposedly can handle up to 256 NAND chips. This of course is more than enough for any single SSD card and while it would be interesting to see if it could really handle that many….it will never happen. In a nut shell this SATA to NAND flash controller is an improved JMF601.
JMicron released the 602 specifically to deal with the stutter issue and to a certain extent it has helped on that front. In many ways this chip has received a bad rap as it is never did live up to the PR promises and hype surrounding it. As we will see later in testing, it is capable of stutter free operation but as with most bleeding edge devices you do need to make some changes to an operating system which was never designed to run Solid State Drives.
In Microsoft’s defence, blaming MS and their Operating Systems for all the stuttering woes is not fair either. This controller is just not powerful enough to properly harness all the power contained in the SSD MLC chips, nor is capable of dealing with all the inherent problems of MLC chips. This is why Intel did not go with this controller chip and why other companies have either gone for a dual 602 RAID 0 setup (inside a single Solid State Drive) or have gone with a totally different controller all together. MLC chips are cheaper to manufacture than SLCs, but they are also inherently slower on writes. As we stated in the G. Skill review, MLC have four states instead of the two with SLC. Before a write can be accomplished on a MLC NAND 4k “block” a write cycle has to be done first. This doubles the amount of cycles required per write and does to a certain extent increase the wear and tear the drive will face. Of course, reads are not effected by this quirk and are just as fast (if not faster, depending on the characteristics of the NAND chips in question) than SLC; heck give it time and MLC NAND chips will become faster than SLC…its just a matter of scale and refinement!
The added wear and tear however, is not overly worrisome as the number of write cycles is in the millions and wear leveling algorithms have come a long way in a very short period of time. Some manufacture’s literature state that that if you erase and write 50GB of data each and every day on a 128GB SSD it will last over 11 years…of course this assumes that this is ALL the data on the drive and you are giving free reign to the wear levelling tech to write evenly to each and every cell. Once again it all goes back to setting up and tweaking your OS to maximize the life expectancy of these drives. This in a nut shell is the down side to the break neck speed and capacity increases the SSD market is experiencing.
In any case the NAND chips used in the Warp v2 are Samsung K9HCG08U1M-PCB0. Using the handy dandy online Samsung model decoder we can see these chips are 48 pin MLC Quad Die Package, 1st gen lead free (ROHS compliant), 2.7V ~ 3.6V, 25 nanosecond NAND chips which have Dual nCE (Dual Chip Enable control) & Dual R/nB (Dual Ready/Busy Output). This model is rated at a density of 64Gbits or 8GB per chip. Above the model number (and as stated earlier) we can see these were made in the 37th week of 2008 and below it we can see the batch number (or at least what we assume is the batch number but is describe by Samsung vaguely as “Customer List Reference” only).
All in all, the v2 looks a lot like many other Samsung rebadged drives on the market today. This is not a put down, nor a complaint as the Samsung reference design is a good design which has been proven to be reliable. We wish they had gone for a different controller, but at least it is the 602 and not the 601. As we have stated earlier in the review it will be interesting to see how well the newer 602 fares on out various tests, as this will make or break the v2.