xentr_theme_editor

  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

Antec Veris MicroFusion Remote 350 HTPC Case Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
xentr_thread_starter
LCD & Remote Control Performance

LCD & Remote Control Performance



The LCD panel itself is fairly adequate considering the size of the display. Some people may complain that it is overly harsh or bright but to us it was decent enough for our setup as it displayed lots of information and the only real issue we have with it concerns viewing angles. We found that it has a very narrow viewable angle and unless you are seated near perfectly in front, all you are going to see is a bright blue light. This is very common with LCD displays and as such it is hard to fault this particular model for having a common failing. Personally, I rather have information displayed on my large screen TV and routinely disconnect any and all LCD displays in my HTPCs so your results may vary.

remote_sm.jpg

Unfortunately, the same lack uster performance can also be said for the integrated iMON IR receiver portion of the iMON kit. We were not impressed with the receiver's ability to recognize commands from anything more than a couple meters distance, unless you were perfectly inline with the receiver. If your entertainment setup is an open air affair things are not too bad, and we did get fairly good reception from across a medium sized room. However, if you are like us and your main entertainment system is partially enclosed with a glass front door (yet open backed for air flow) you may end up cursing the remote's inability to send a strong enough signal for the receiver to actually recognize it. The only time we were able to get adequate results was when we were directly inline with the front of the case and had a perfect 90° front on shot. If you are positioned on even a moderate amount of angle /deflection your chances of getting an “answer” from the HTPC is remote to say the least. The best thing which can be said about this unit is at least it did not suffer from any interference from our other remotes.

For starting/stopping, pausing, increasing/decreasing volume the remote will suffice but that is about all it is good for. This really is too bad as the iMON software is actually very good (if a bit redundant). We like the idea of being able to press one large “GO” button and select what app we want to launch. We like the idea of a virtual onscreen keyboard, we even like the idea of changing resolutions (all options available in the iMON software) but this iteration is just not good enough to justify the added expense of this Remote version of the Fusion.

remote2_sm.jpg

This reason for these inherent limitations steams from the fact that this remote is tiny, Antec calls it a “petite remote” and boy they are not kidding. In the above picture we have placed it next to a 92mm fan; and as you can see the fan is about the same size. If you are planning on using this remote on a continuous basis, we recommend tying a long chain to it and bolting it to something BIG (like those pens at banks) or get a beeper for it ‘cause this thing is easy to loose. During testing phase, every time we would put it down for even a moment the darn thing would run off and hide in our seat cushions! This of course is an exaggeration, as we are almost positive it doesn’t house a malevolent intelligence bound on frustrating its “master”… it just acts that way.

All in all, small / micro HTPC cases are notorious for their long list of necessary compromises but we think the remote and LCD components should not be on this list. If you are going to go through the time and effort to include an LCD and remote, please by the Holy Jar of Ragu make it a good one!

With all this negativity surrounding this accessory we must caution in discounting the whole case just because of one minor foible. The Fusion itself is actually a very good case, just one which Antec dropped the ball on with their selection of this particular iMON IR / LCD receiver. It is very frustrating that Antec selected this particular accessory as iMON does make some very good models. In an upcoming mini-review we will actually be taking a look at two Veris branded iMON units to see how they stack up. Hopefully, future revisions of this case will come with a better model and then no one will have to decide whether or not they can live with the issues outlined above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
xentr_thread_starter
CPU and Heatsink Recommendations

CPU and Heatsink Recommendations


Even though there are three of those TriCool fans in this unit, we do have concerns about using any high rated Thermal Design Power (TDP) CPUs with the Fusion Remote. This is a serious concern which is not limited to this particular HTPC; rather it is a common complaint with all micro cases we have seen. The root cause of this issue is the fact this case is not tall enough for most aftermarket CPU coolers. Just as you cannot use a full profile video card, a tall tower cooler is a no go as well.

Before you get too discouraged and pass judgment on a whole class of HTPCs, there are some pretty persuasive countervailing information you need to be aware of. Simply put, this case simply loves 45 watt TDP processors. There is simply no other way to put it; and we are quite sure it is not just limited to AMD processors. The new generation of ultra cool running desktop processors are designed to be run in adverse, air cooling restricted environments and it shows. With the prevalence of these low power 45W TDP CPUs, the inability to use massive CPU air coolers in no longer such a big deal. However if you are seriously considering a monster Quad you may want to up size your case first.

AMD.jpg


Some great CPUs for this case include the 35/45 watt TDP dual processors from AMD (3800+EE SFF 35watt TDP or 4250e/4450e/4850e, and BE-2xxx series), the various cool running C2D’s from Intel such as the 4, 6 & 7xxx line and even the 8xxx line. In other words, as long as you stay away from the super high end (6000+or above from AMD and the high end of the 8xxx C2D line from Intel) you should be fine. Of course, one shouldn’t count out the lower powered 2xxx & 5xxx Pentium line for low priced, low heat options either. Remember, these are simply recommendations are based on our concerns of inadequate air circulation within the case.

Intel.jpg


When it comes to quad cores your options are severely limited for the time being. To be totally honest, we consider 65 watt TDP CPUs to be a good safe high watermark for this case, which limits your options to the 9100e and 9350e from AMD. Intel right now does not offer their low voltage Xeons in a 775 package (L5310 & L5335 are 771 pin chips); and in fact do not sell any 65watt TDP 775 quad processors at this point. This will hopefully change as their 45nm process matures. If you do not mind running your quads hotter than normal then your options are lot broader and include the Q9300 from Intel. Actually, if you do not mind running your processor hotter than would be considered normal (yet still inside their thermal envelope), just as about any 89/90/95 watt TDP processor would work….As long as you invest in a good low profile aftermarket air cooler that is.

scythe_sm.jpg

When it comes to aftermarket heatsinks, low profile is a necessity but in the case of the MicroFusion Remote 350 the options are darn near non existent. Over on the NCIX forum some helpful soul stated the Scythe Mini-Ninja would fit….to bad s/he meant the Fusion 430. As you can see in the first picture, a Mini-Ninja is just too tall.

height_sm.jpg

Underscoring how little room you actually have, we yanked the CPU and laid an 80mm fan across it. As you can see in the second picture you would have a hard time getting the case lid back on just with the fan installed. Add in the height of the CPU, heatpipes and the actual cooler and your hopes of any 80mm heatsink are toast. In reality you only have about 70-75mm of height. Since this eliminates most (if not all) tower style coolers the only option left (for air cooling) is down draft coolers. However, for a downdraft cooler to operate efficiently you need a minimum of 15-20mm of space between the case lid and the top of the fan. This further restricts you cooler’s height to about 50-60mm. This is not much room to work with BUT AMD does make a very decent stock cooler with heat pipes. Unfortunately, they do not ship it with cool running CPUs you will be interested in, but we have seen them go for as little as $10 used.

heatpipe_Sm.jpg

To solve our cooling dilemma we rummaged around in Ye Olde Parts Bin and found an old 939 style heatpipe cooler which was originally used to cool out first generation 4800+. This heasink in particular was designed to handle 89/90 TDP CPU so it shouldn’t have any problem with a 45 or 65 watter. If you are lucky enough to find one of these little fellers, we recommend yanking the low profile 20mm high fan and replacing it with a good 80x80x25mm fan. This thicker fan will in turn generate less noise and when it comes HTPCs, less noise really is the name of the game.

All in all, your choices may be severely curtailed but with a bit of ingenuity you can easily overcome this height restriction and end up with a very powerful, low noise, low heat solution. It really is all up to you!

Before we continue, some people may argue HTPC systems are not going to have their processors running maxed out very often let alone for extended purposes and this argument does have some merit to it. If you plan on only using your HTPC for recording movies, playing back DVDs (or even Blu-Ray discs both of which can be offloaded to the GPU) there is something to be said for us being too conservative in our recommendations and you can chose your CPU a lot more freely than we are suggesting. However, a lot of people (myself included) use up converting software as we do not want to reinvest in a completely new Blu-Ray movie collection. This unfortunately means our low def DVDs don’t look their best on our high definition, large screen TVs. To us the freeware program FFDShow + Movie Player Classic + appropriate codecs is the solution to our dilemma. FFDshow uses the power of your CPU to interpolate and up convert with results which simply destroy hardware based solutions (e.g. Oppo up converting DVD players, or even Nvidia GPU acceleration). The downside is this combination is very processor intensive and some combinations can bring any dual core ever created to its knees and easily max out a quad's power.

As time goes by and as processor numbers multiply, this situation may change. If you are not planning on running your high end processor (or even 100+ TDP quads) maxed out then maybe you can consider them a viable option. It really is all up to your needs, wants and desires.


Water Cooling Options


wc_sm.jpg

If you don’t mind having two 3/8” tubes running out the back of your MicroFusion Remote 350, then water cooling does become a viable option. We are not suggesting this is for everyone, nor are we suggesting ruining the overall ascetics of this beautiful case. Rather, with the simple purchase of 3/8” tubing (Switftech`s neoprene tubing just fits through the PCI slot), an Apogee Drive water block/pump combination with a Switftech Radbox and you can have a great cooling solution which can be mounted to the back of your entertainment center. Back there no one will see it, and if you pick good quiet fans no one will hear it either. Heck, if you want to get real fancy, substitute a Swiftech Apogee 1U low profile water block and use a Liang DDC 3.1 (aka MCP350) pump or even the newer DangerDen DDCPX-Pro pump; though this last one would be overkill in most situations. As you can see the options are mostly limited to your budget (the basic Swiftech H20-120 goes for about $140 + cost of Feser One fluid) and your imagination!

This may not be for everyone as WC’ing does have its negative points (leaks can occur, and while the Feser One will limit the damage nothing will eliminate this possibility all together, remember dust + fluid = potential for damage); nor does everyone have an entertainment system rack to bolt the Radbox too. For everyone else, please don’t overlook the water option just because it’s unusual. Be different. Be unusual. Not many people can claim to have a water cooled entertainment system now can they?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
xentr_thread_starter
Conclusion

CONCLUSION


There is a lot to like about the MicroFusion Remote 350. The case itself is a wonderful mix of design and elegance which would make even the most comprehensive of entertainment centers complete. The case itself is classic Antec engineering, and from an engineering standpoint is pretty darn impressive. To be honest, the only thing better than its classy brushed aluminum looks is its potential for durability. Our first impressions told us this was going to be a great case and both our external and internal impressions helped reinforce this feeling; however, once we started the installation process glaring shortcomings started to appear. These shortcomings and annoyances were to some extent alleviated by the good software included but in the end they were compounded once we got to the LCD / IR portion and further reinforced by the remote’s shortcomings.

In this market niche, function has to follow form and in a lot of cases this means corner cutting and shortcuts which take away from the overall experience. We truly understand that you really can’t fit to 10 quarts of awesome in a one quart jug, but this case really does tread a fine line between the two. It really only goes to pot once you include the LCD and IR receiver (and that annoying little remote). We could live with having only three standoffs, or even the hassle factor of the hard drive installation if were not for the various iMON shortcomings. Antec has really dropped the ball by making their end users work too hard at installing a simple hard drive, just so they could cram in the iMON accessory. If this case didn’t come with this accessory the majority of our issues with the case would have disappeared but you pay for it so we can't ignore then thing. When you get right down to it, we would rather have a great SFF case like the MicroFusion with no remote and no LCD than this meager hybrid attempt. The LCD and IR portion feel like an afterthought and in all honesty we would be sorely tempted to just yank it from the case and call it a day.

This really is too bad, as this is a wonderfully designed case and it really does deserve a long hard look by potential buyers. We know this sounds a little schizophrenic of us after just hammering on it negative points, but we know there is a diamond in amongst the rough. On a personal note, and just to show how much faith and respect I have for this case (and once I get around to yanking that iMON albatross out of it) I will be using the much improved case as the basis for a personal HTPC of water cooled goodness. To me this is the largest personal accolade I can give a product, even if it is a delivered in a back handed manner.

If you are like us and can overlook the LCD and remote portion of this case, you may just find a micro case to your liking in the rest of the parts. Hopefully, like the mighty Phoenix rose from the ashes the next generation MicroFusion Remote 350 case will not be a true series refresh with a great full sized remote and maybe even a VFD panel instead of an LCD. This to us would be the ideal micro case which would certainly merit a HWC award. As its stands, you need to be a tweaker or tinkerer to consider the MicroFusion Remote 350 the perfect case since only then will it live up to the potential we know is lurking deep inside.


Pros
- Powerfully Petite!
- Elegant and stylish design
- 80+ PSU included
- LCD & IR remote included
- Nicely done hidden optical bay door


Cons
- Only 3 brass standoffs included
- Poor IR reception
- Small Remote
- LCD has terrible viewing angles
- LCD assembly needs to be removed in order to install a hard drive


Thanks to Antec for sending us this product for review
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top