Go Back   Hardware Canucks > SOFTWARE > Gaming

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old December 7, 2013, 09:29 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: an hour out of Calgary
Posts: 405
Default BF4 hardware utilization

Finally some seemingly accurate info ( after reading endless opinions) hopefully not a repost Battlefield 4 Retail GPU and CPU Benchmarks

If nothing else the fanboy flame war in the comments was sort of fun,not how things are done at HWC thankfully.

Last edited by Jim; December 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old December 7, 2013, 10:30 PM
Phill's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Morden MB
Posts: 594

My System Specs

Default

nice! I run 2560X1600 with a 780 and yes those numbers look more realistic.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old December 7, 2013, 10:40 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: an hour out of Calgary
Posts: 405
Default

I swear there must be a 100 times more disinformation out there regarding cpu/gpu performance than fact.ha we both joined March 07
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old December 8, 2013, 05:43 AM
MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cold Lake , Alberta , Canada
Posts: 341
Default

They must be a slight difference between the 780 ( I'm assuming it's stock) that they're using for this benchmark and the classified edition that I have. Granted I have a 4670k but I'm never dropping below 65fps @ 2560X1600 with no AA. I average 75 most of the time.
__________________
Gaming Rig
Core i5 4670k 3.4ghz
EVGA GTX 780 3Gb Classified
Dell U3011 + Yamakasi Sparta 301
Asus Z87-A
12GB Dominator 1800
Samsung 840 pro 256gb
Corsair HSX 1000watts
Mountain Mod UFO-U2
Razer Deathadder 2014
Logitech G510
Asus Xonar Essence STX
Sennheisers PC360
2 X 150GB Raptor X RAID 0



Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old December 8, 2013, 06:55 AM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: an hour out of Calgary
Posts: 405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by implosion222 View Post
They must be a slight difference between the 780 ( I'm assuming it's stock) that they're using for this benchmark and the classified edition that I have. Granted I have a 4670k but I'm never dropping below 65fps @ 2560X1600 with no AA. I average 75 most of the time.
Wow nice!Now that's real world info I trust,thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old December 9, 2013, 04:41 PM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Posts: 1,221

My System Specs

Default

I can tell you that a 780 Classified is overkill for 1920x1080 although it's a tough fight at 5760x1080. You can't max out the AA with a 780, but you can max everything else and push over 60 fps. With AA off and everything else maxed (although I use SBAO instead of HBAO), I don't drop below 60 fps at 1080p. I did find I have had some "less than smooth" gameplay at times... haven't looked into a pattern or frequency yet, but it only impacted about 1/5 of the hours I've played so far.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old December 9, 2013, 07:30 PM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,545

My System Specs

Default

Very nice info. RAM wise it proves that 4GB would cut the mustard just fine, and even a core i3 would work just fine, the one in the review is the i3-2100 clocked at 3.1 GHz but imagine a Haswell i3 at 3.5 GHz, that would be a nice performance boost. 10% from the IPC improvements alone and another 10% from the higher frequency and you have a nice gamer. (I never understood why the people go always overkill with i7s and 16GB of RAM.) All you need to splash on is the GPU, but even a 7870 would keep you happy at 1920x1080 as long as you don't engage the FSAA mode.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old December 13, 2013, 01:10 PM
vandidant's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 67
Default

In regards to the CPU benchmarks, they used an ARES II, and from just looking that one graph one can come to the conclusion that the CPU is always the bottleneck. Could the benchmark be incorrect, or perhaps BF4 itself is artificially loading the CPU to get more sales for Intel? If the CPU is not a bottleneck, then why would the FPS increases be so linear, should it just cap out when it maxes out the GPU usage?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old December 14, 2013, 03:26 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,384

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vandidant View Post
In regards to the CPU benchmarks, they used an ARES II, and from just looking that one graph one can come to the conclusion that the CPU is always the bottleneck. Could the benchmark be incorrect, or perhaps BF4 itself is artificially loading the CPU to get more sales for Intel? If the CPU is not a bottleneck, then why would the FPS increases be so linear, should it just cap out when it maxes out the GPU usage?
It looks like they have some sort of way where they can use the CPU to help out the GPU and push more frames, if you push the GPU harder the frames go up and if you push the GPU higher the frames go up.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old December 27, 2013, 05:52 PM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Posts: 1,221

My System Specs

Default



I run a 4820k @ 4.6 Ghz with an EVGA 780 Classified and 16 GB DDR3.
This is a run of operation locker large conquest and a variety of both indoor and outdoor and a few times of excessive grenade spamming.

In game settings:

Resolution: 5900x1080
FOV = 70
Motion blur = 0%
Weapon DOF = ON
All settings on "high" unless noted-
Texture Filtering = Ultra
Effects Quality = Ultra
Mesh Quality = ULTRA
AA Deferred = OFF
AA Post = OFF
AO = SSAO
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New hardware r0k0 O/S's, Drivers & General Software 4 June 17, 2012 09:01 AM
Some Old W/C Hardware... deathsupport Water Cooling 1 March 26, 2010 01:37 PM
GPU client 100% cpu core utilization? hd4200 folding? 0o0 HardwareCanucks F@H Team 18 December 21, 2009 03:53 PM
Don't F**k with Tom's Hardware FiXT Off Topic 61 November 10, 2009 12:53 PM