Quote:
Originally Posted by MpG Depends on what you're looking for in an FPS. Warhead definitely upped the action-ante, but the original was a little more cerebral in approach (if you wanted to play it that way). Both are extremely demanding on hardware, although the reasons for that vary according to which couch-programmer you're talking to. On the other hand, I'd seriously argue that the sheer quality of in-game graphics (ignoring playability concerns) have yet to be beaten, even by more recent releases. |
Agreed with this, frankly I loved both, but it depends on your tastes, Warhead was WAYYYYYY more action packed, you almost never slowed down in that one. Crysis on the otherhand was more, you can take it slow, go guns blazing, etc, but even if you went guns blazing there were some nice down "relax" "explore" periods.
Depends on your tastes, both very good, I personally liked Crysis a bit more because to got to take in the sights, explore, etc a bit more.