AMD better for BF4?
WTF, all beta benchmarks I find shows that AMD is beating up intel on this game. Please talk me out of pulling the trigger on a 9590 by showing some bad benchmarks for it on bf4. Otherwise I will have a volcano in my tower :shok:
It's still in beta isn't it? I'd take Skymtl's advice and wait until the release version numbers are out in order to give both teams time to tweak. (Although I'm not sure if CPU manus do any tweaking for games.... ;) ).
If I was the OP (as a BF4-focused individual),
WAIT FOR THE FULL RETAIL LAUNCH of BF4....we're being fooled...it's a BETA.
I would be a LOT more "curious" about AMD R9-290X performance in BF4 FULL RETAIL + Mantle possible improvements, than targeting an AMD CPU/MOBO platform at this point.
I would also investigate on the theory that Windows 8.1 deals better with BF4 than Win 7
OP, those AMD CPUs have a brutal TDP (as you probably read SKY's review on the 9590) and you'll need a great mobo + great cooling to keep the "volcano" under control. Don't forget to wrap the CPU socket in an asbestos blanket, JK.
An Haswell 4770K CPU + a 140$-ish MOBO is a better proposition than the volcano IMHO.
If you go for the "comet", well, god-speed and enjoy your toy!
Oh, I think the following is a thermal compound developed for FX-9590 :canadianwave::
Yeah but there's a deal to get the volcano, best mobo for 990fx and a h100i for under 700 bucks!!!
Hahahaha fireproof TIM! Enough for 1000 applications :rofl:
OTOH it is always possible that BF4 does a great job of utilizing all available cores, and that is something that amd procs can excel at. If that's the case I'd be looking at one of the lower tsp procs though. :-)
I'm seeing more benchmarks with haswell; it's beating up amd! I may just pick up a cheap i5 combo instead and buy a ssd, which i've been meaning to do for a long time.
but FX chip used properly will smoke many of the other chips out there as does the encoding/decoding that utilizes them properly AND if mantle does what it is supposed to do that will let the chip really fly.
AMD will be better for BF4 and upcoming EA titles for many reasons IF AMD and their partners work towards making that happen.
so your logic is off bud.
if anything the game is just currently poorly optimized for some of the intel chips. that should change.
...or maybe, just maybe, are almost all the benchmarks optimized more for Intel that for AMD processors, witch in end mean, that the first time someone write engine for AMD FX processors, it will make then shine and everyone is caught by "surprise."
Not to forget that this is just a preview and the Mantle will be a gamechanger in all aspects. If the FX CPUs shine now, wait till they go utilize the hardware using Mantle multi-cores approach.
I'm not a AMD fanboy, in fact, I type this text on intel, but I'm not blind either. In many games the AMD cpu's (that are much weaker in many other tests compared to Intel offerings) score surprisingly good (eg. much faster that they should be scoring, when judging by the systetic benchmarks), so there is a potencial that is looking to be unleashed.
Witch is why AMD "wasted" two years on Mantle.
Of course, cooling will be a issue :D
AMD's will come to the fore once the games can fully utilize all their cores.
Mantle has no affect on CPU (apart from reducing the load due to much reduced calls)
There is nothing wrong with your current CPU. Is there anything you need it to do that it currently won't?
Stick to what you have and when the processing performance gets to low for you, then think about upgrading.
|All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:40 AM.|