Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > CPU's and Motherboards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 30, 2012, 07:53 PM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,666
Default AMD Vishera FX-6300 & FX-4300 Review Comment Thread

While the FX-8350 may have hogged the lion's share of AMD's Vishera launch coverage, a number of more affordable processors were introduced alongside it. The six core FX-6300 and quad core FX-4300 are both priced under $140 and should provide some real competition for Intel's i3 series Ivy Bridge CPUs.

Read more here: AMD Vishera FX-6300 & FX-4300 Review

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 30, 2012, 08:27 PM
MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 410
Default

I was expecting the quad core to be significantly better than its APU counterpart.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 30, 2012, 08:30 PM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,666
Default

How would it be though? The APU is able to get to 4.2GHz with Turbo while the quad only gets to 4.0. Granted, TDP overhead means the FX-4300 will spend more time at or near its max Turbo rate (due to the lack of an internal graphics processor) but that will only affect some tests and not others.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 30, 2012, 08:48 PM
Mena's Avatar
MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hanover, Ontario
Posts: 475
Default

Wow....

AMD seriously needs to smarten up with its power draws for its CPU's. AMD CPU's are really power hungry compared to Intels.
__________________
I am watching you.

For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.

When a ladder was stolen from a store the manager said that further steps would be taken
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 30, 2012, 09:19 PM
MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 410
Default

I was going for more of a value/pricing perspective. FM boards are much cheaper than AM3+, and for the same price of the CPU, you get a decent onboard video. The CPU difference is too small to make the FX worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 31, 2012, 03:51 AM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,226

My System Specs

Default

Thanks for throwing in the gaming bench for the overclocking section. It lets me know that it'll be a downgrade for me if I replace my Sandy Bridge platform that can't overclock with an overclocked FX for gaming I wanted to try my first custom water loop with these FX but if it won't make a difference and I'll have to replace my UPS for the added power consumption...

I'm surprised how little a difference the lack of shared cache has between the A10 and the FX-4300 in everything other than gaming with dedicated GPU, a bench in which both AMD CPUs are slaughtered by Intel at the same price point. IMHO you got that conclusion correct in not awarding the 4300. The FX-4300 is comparable to Sandy Bridge Pentiums in performance, but the price is just too high to put those in the same bracket.
__________________
"The computer programmer says they should drive the car around the block and see if the tire fixes itself." [src]
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 31, 2012, 05:02 AM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,666
Default

I really had to scratch my head over AMD's quad core pricing strategy. I had a whole other section written but it wouldn't have really added to the conclusion since it was more opinion-based rather than factual.

Basically, I can't see why AMD would want to protect the A10 series, especially against the FX-4300. The APUs are aimed at an OEM / system builder market while the FX-series certainly isn't so there can't be all that much product overlap. Had the FX-4300 been priced at $110, I would have been singing its praises.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 31, 2012, 05:03 AM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,925

My System Specs

Default

Nice review and nice conclusion. Seems the 6300 and 8350 would be solid recommendations if you don't mind a bit of extra power consumption for the price, and its not a dedicated gaming rig. The 4300 performance drop per $ is just too great.

I am now wondering about the 8320 though. I am curious if they will get as much of an OC as a 8350 given the money saved going with the 8320. I am not sure if its performance would end up closer to a 6300 or a 8350, given it has similar clocks to a 6300, but the core count of the 8350.
__________________
Desktop: Antec Three Hundred, Z77-D3H, 3570K undervolt @4.1ghz with Zalman Optima Cooler, Corsair Vengeance 2x4gb@1866mhz, MSI Cyclone GTX 460, Seasonic S12II 500W, WD Black 1TB, Intel 530 120GB
Away from home light Gamer: Acer Aspire 15.6", A8-3500m undervolt and OC to 2Ghz, 2x4gb Corsair Vengeance, Crucial M500 240gb
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old October 31, 2012, 07:06 AM
sswilson's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 14,535

My System Specs

Default

IMO there's still nothing there to recommend one of these over either a deneb (got a 965 for $90 the other day) or the hex cores (not so easy to find these days) unless there's a specific application which takes advantage of their new instructions.

I haven't seen it mentioned so am assuming that the answer in no, but am wondering if anything in win8 benefits from bulldozer/piledriver? (Not that I'm going to be running win8..... ;) ).
__________________
MSI Z87I Gaming AC / i5 4670K / 2X 4G Gskill 1866 DDR3 / XFX XTR 750 / EVGA GTX 680 SC+ 2GB / Intel DC S3700 200G / random 160G Sata HDD
Inwin 904 / Swiftech MCP655-b / Alphacool NexXxos XT45 120 Rad / 2X Scythe GT AP-15 / EK Supreme HF / Dell UltraSharp U2412M

Asrock AM1H-ITX / AM1 Athlon 5350 / 2X4G Gskill PC3-14900 / Intel 6235 Wi-Fi / 90W Targus Power Brick / 320G Seagate Momentus / Mini-Box M350 / 1X 22" Dell IPS / 1X 22" HP
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old October 31, 2012, 07:54 AM
MVP
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunshine coast, BC
Posts: 483
Default

Some what disappointed again, there's nothing worth ditching the 965be for.
__________________
x4 965BE 3.7ghz / Tuniq Tower 120/ R9 280X / G Skill 12800CL9D 4x4GBXL/ S12D 850w/ GA 990FXA-UD3 /WD640AALS Black, WD1TB FALS x1, / Dell IPS 1920x1080/ Win 7 64
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD FX-8350 Vishera CPU Review COMMENT THREAD SKYMTL CPU's and Motherboards 159 February 2, 2013 02:31 PM
GTX 660 Ti Review Comment Thread SKYMTL Video Cards 147 September 15, 2012 11:45 PM
BFG GTX 260 Review Comment Thread SKYMTL Video Cards 33 November 15, 2008 10:26 PM