Return of AMD FX: My OC'd AMD FX 8150 with OC'd 6990 Review - First Results Up!

[polyzp]

If all you want is to have my thread closed and to be insulting, then you sir are a troll and I have nothing more to say to you! :)

[gingerbee]

well i do not care i said i just want to be sure what were seeing is straight truth that's all i don't care about this thread to want it closed i just want to be sure BD can do what were seeing is all thanks and have a nice day

[polyzp]

My results are legitimate, you can argue that the comparisons are "skewed", but not that the results themselves are skewed.

[terrybear]

Dont mind the AMD haters, they just dont want to see or hear that the chip is actualy decent. Keep it up, been enjoyin the thread myself. :)

[gingerbee]

totally giving up on this asking for him to back it up a little is all and now there nothing but bs cause were haters ( lmfao ) in fact i was one really really hoping BD was going to kick ass and it doesn't if it did we wouldn't need to be having this thread or this conversion done i am out

oh and to mention this is the only stuff this person has uploaded makes me have to wonder if ya don't you must be lost

[polyzp]

How do you want me to "back it up" my results are what they are.

[gingerbee]

by repeating it with another build ( with different board ) and show all your setting cause there others who went to 4.6 and didn't get your results that's how for it not to be a freak of nature it must be repeatable you know like science

[polyzp]

Originally Posted by gingerbee

by repeating it with another build ( with different board ) and show all your setting cause there others who went to 4.6 and didn't get your results that's how for it not to be a freak of nature it must be repeatable you know like science

Results between a 4.8 Ghz and a 4.6 ghz FX should be roughyl the percent difference between clocks (4.3%). We know memory, motherboard, bclk, multiplier, HT, and NB settings will also give or take about 5-10% performance together (clock isnt everything). Show me where my results are off more than 15% with a 4.6 Ghz, and for what specific test. I am curious to see this!

[polyzp]

SpecViewPerf 11 Scores up! Tomorrow Updating 7-zip with 2600k results!

[Silent_Avenger]

Well since AMD(or whoever it was I'm sure it was AMD) claims that windows 8 will have proper scheduling for the FX procs why not get a spare HDD and throw the win 8 dev preview on it and see if you get any better boost even if win 8 isn't complete yet?