Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > CPU's and Motherboards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old December 22, 2011, 07:22 PM
JD's Avatar
JD JD is offline
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,903

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by r0k0 View Post
wouldn't a GTX 560 be slower then a 5970 ? the 5970 is a Dual GPU card with 2GB compared to 1 GTX 560 with 1GB
I would say the GTX560 outperforms the HD5970 in 3DMark at the very least.

Compare only the CPU scores, not the overall score, then you'll have a slightly more accurate picture.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old January 5, 2012, 09:02 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 25
Default

i will go 2500K for sure. you don't really need extra thread for daily use.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old January 5, 2012, 09:26 PM
bissa's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 1,160

My System Specs

Default

really depends on your acceptable budget. if you are willing to spend some more for fractionally better performance once in a while, then go for it. it will last a little longer for when more things start supporting 8 cores.
I would say go with what was said earlier, save and get an LGA2011 CPU such as the 3930 or 3950 (if that's out). as that would be an actual upgrade and would be significant upgrade at that because of the extra 2 cores and extra 4 total threads.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old January 5, 2012, 09:28 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 10,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bissa View Post
really depends on your acceptable budget. if you are willing to spend some more for fractionally better performance once in a while, then go for it. it will last a little longer for when more things start supporting 8 cores.
I would say go with what was said earlier, save and get an LGA2011 CPU such as the 3930 or 3950 (if that's out). as that would be an actual upgrade and would be significant upgrade at that because of the extra 2 cores and extra 4 total threads.
How long have we been saying "when things start using more cores"? . Fact is 2500k does everything most people need for quite a bit less
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old January 5, 2012, 10:45 PM
bissa's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 1,160

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enaberif View Post
How long have we been saying "when things start using more cores"? . Fact is 2500k does everything most people need for quite a bit less
good point. I guess I'm also looking at it from a folding point of view.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i7 2600K or i5 2500k? SnowJim CPU's and Motherboards 10 November 19, 2011 11:17 AM
[WTB] Intel 2500k/2600k richuwo11 Buy/Sell & Trade 1 September 30, 2011 08:58 AM
[WTB] WTB 2600k or 2500k, also a s775 mobo Table21 Buy/Sell & Trade 2 September 2, 2011 07:42 PM
i7 2600K vs i5 2500K (Almost built) sstrucel New Builds 9 August 17, 2011 09:48 AM
2500k or 2600k kyle_L New Builds 4 August 4, 2011 10:49 AM