Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > CPU's and Motherboards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 12:07 AM
lowfat's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 8,101

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC View Post
By the way, I updated that section to include the overclocked power consumption numbers, you will be...impressed.
800W for CPU+GPU load is nothing short of ridiculous.
__________________
Mael
Big Lian Li
Forever Alone
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 12:12 AM
MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moocow View Post
Can't really afford anything better I'm afraid. I could buy a used i7-920 from the trading forum for similar performance but it would even burn more juice. The benchmark does make people wonder what AMD R&D is doing. Yes, engineering anything takes time, effort, and money but when the product barely beat out Intel and even your last generation product, it really hard to justify the price.
Funny, the only chart I saw that compared OVERCLOCKED <8150 vs 920>, the 920 was pulling less power.

You can afford better, it's a 2500K and cheaper than an 8150. Even has a built in onboard GPU that still can be used even if you have a separate vid card. Oh, and it uses less than half the power under load.

Not an Intel fanboi, just calling it like I see it.

IN FAIRNESS, there is lots of development still to come, to optimize Bulldozer. Chipset drivers, bioses, and so forth. And some are saying that FSB/Northbridge overclocking could be a key missing component in all the reviews.
__________________
2600K @4.6
P8Z68-V Pro Gen3
Patriot Div2 Viper Extreme PC3-15000 4GBx2 (1866 9-11-9-27-2)
Gigabyte GTX780
Caviar Black 1TB x2 RAID0
Corsair Gold 850W
Corsair H80
Corsair 600T Graphite
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 12:20 AM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,009
Default

Keep in mind that this is with 1.50V, which you are unlikely to use unless you have a terrific cooling system.

I'll see what 4.2GHz @ 1.40V is like a little later.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 12:36 AM
Mook06's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 114

My System Specs

Default

suckage, lack of competition is lose-lose for everyone
intel may as well bump up pricing right now as it stands

im shocked at how lackluster the multithreaded performance is, not gonna even start with the rest, i was really hoping the new instruction sets would level the playing field
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 12:39 AM
MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 399

My System Specs

Default

I wonder how much juice does BD sip at 8.4GHz during that world record run the other day? Care to test that out?
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 12:43 AM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dma0991 View Post
I wonder how much juice does BD sip at 8.4GHz during that world record run the other day? Care to test that out?
Probably not that much to be honest.

The cooler a processor is the less power it consumes, so supposedly super-cooled processors are extremely energy efficient.

Someone else can surely elaborate on the physics behind it.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 01:05 AM
bradleyg5's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keto View Post

IN FAIRNESS, there is lots of development still to come, to optimize Bulldozer. Chipset drivers, bioses, and so forth. And some are saying that FSB/Northbridge overclocking could be a key missing component in all the reviews.
How are they going to continue to develop bulldozer if they go bankrupt in six months?
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 01:31 AM
EmptyMellon's Avatar
MVP
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 436

My System Specs

Default Individual Core manipulation is possible

Quote:
Now you should take these results with a grain of salt. Unlike with Intel's chips, where it is easy to disable cores from within the BIOS, there is no such luxury on the AMD side. ....

Am I missing something? I was pretty sure that it was possible to do so in the latest version of ASUS UEFI. And if I have this ability in an ASUS M5A99X Evo, then Crosshair V should definetly have this ability. Pretty sure it is under the Advanced tab in the UEFI, same place where you have "Core Unlocker" and "Core Activation", please do correct me if I am wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 01:52 AM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmptyMellon View Post
[/I]
Am I missing something? I was pretty sure that it was possible to do so in the latest version of ASUS UEFI. And if I have this ability in an ASUS M5A99X Evo, then Crosshair V should definetly have this ability. Pretty sure it is under the Advanced tab in the UEFI, same place where you have "Core Unlocker" and "Core Activation", please do correct me if I am wrong.
Sorry, I worded that poorly, I mean't to say that it doesn't actually work on Bulldozer.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2011, 01:53 AM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
Default

Its a shame it went down like this, but I guess Intel wins again. Well I guess I'll be going Intel again, however I still have hope that the quad core BD chips might still be a nice bang for the buck. the reason I say that is because they will (hopefully) have enough overclocking headroom that they should be a decent bit better then the Phenom II X4's core for core and in the same price range. AMD said the FX-4100 (quad core) would retail for $115 USD at that price point it could still give some hell two Intel's I3's/ low end I5's.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition Processor Review Comment Thread SKYMTL CPU's and Motherboards 12 May 3, 2011 07:27 PM
Intel Core i7-980X Gulftown Processor Review Comment Thread SKYMTL CPU's and Motherboards 103 September 23, 2010 02:21 PM
BFG GTX 260 Review Comment Thread SKYMTL Video Cards 33 November 15, 2008 11:26 PM
BFG GTX 280 OCX Review Comment Thread SKYMTL Video Cards 15 August 19, 2008 09:07 PM