Here's what Charlie is saying over at Semiaccurate:
AMD misses, Bergman scores, all in one day | SemiAccurate How bad is it? We previously mentioned the 50-60% yield numbers, but there is a more important number, fully working, IE A8, chips. Yields for those parts are said to be in the 5-15% range, something a little worse than abysmal. To put a positive spin on things, there are a lot more A6s and A4s floating around than A8s, so if you are in the market for one of those, things look good. Back to the negative side, there aren’t many of either in the channel, nor do their look to be soon.
For those playing at home, you can get a rundown on the different models here:
AMD A-Series Processor Model Number and Feature Comparisons
Basically A8's have 400
Radeon™ Cores on die @ 600 MHz. The A6's have 320 @ 443 MHz and the A4's have 160 @ 600 MHz or 443 MHz. There are 2 A8's listed, 3 A6's and 2 A4's. The two A8's have 4 x86 cores, two of the A6's have 4 x86 cores and one model has 3. The A4's are dual core x86.
If the problem in yielding these Llano parts is in the GPU portion, then you'd expect the A8's to have the worst yields...