Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > CPU's and Motherboards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 03:56 PM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,836
Default Intel Core i3-540 Review Comment Thread

When Intel's Clarkdale processors were first released, they opened up the 1156 platform to a whole new market of budget conscious buyers. A low-cost, 32nm processor like the i3 540 may not be immediately interesting to the vast majority of enthusiasts but considering this efficient chip sports four threads and a core speed slightly above 3Ghz, it could be perfect for many consumers. In this review we take a closer look at the 540 to see how well it fits into Intel's current lineup.


[ Read full article ]
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 04:23 PM
Banned
F@H
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mtl
Posts: 12,694
Default

the performance of this chip(overclocked) is quite the show stealer.

nice review, grammaticals look ok(skipped most of everything :p )

Last edited by _dangtx_; May 3, 2010 at 04:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 04:27 PM
SugarJ's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 6,141

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _dangtx_ View Post
to be edited.
Why bother? We don't do that "First!" BS around here.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 04:43 PM
MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 261

My System Specs

Default

Nice review... although I can't see how you recommend the 540 over the 530. A quick check on NCIX shows a $25 CAD premium, for somewhere around an extra 200mhz. That's less than 5% higher overclocking clock speed for about 20% more money, and certainly less than 5% higher performance. Right?

I've used the 530 to build a few systems in the last couple of months... I'd be interested to see all of your BIOS settings for the overclock. It might be different chips, or different boards, but I've only been able to get around 4.1 GHZ with some boards/chips, with 4.4 GHZ on others. I guess I'm doing it right then... used the ASRock H55m, ASUS H55 EVO and Gigabyte H55m USB3... Also, I've been setting the QPI and Uncore frequencies low (as per Bloomfield), didn't realize you could bump these up. Should you start OCing like this, or raise them up after you've reached your target frequency?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 04:57 PM
Eldonko's Avatar
Hardware Canucks Reviewer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,445
Default

Nice review m8. Good clocking chip for the price although the mem results are a little disappointing.
__________________
Donkeys kill more people annually than plane crashes or shark attacks.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 05:39 PM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Markham
Posts: 1,570

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikellini View Post
Nice review... although I can't see how you recommend the 540 over the 530. A quick check on NCIX shows a $25 CAD premium, for somewhere around an extra 200mhz. That's less than 5% higher overclocking clock speed for about 20% more money, and certainly less than 5% higher performance. Right?
23x multiplier vs 22x, 540 is probably binned higher as well. Whether or not it's worth the premium depends on what you're using it for.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 06:10 PM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikellini View Post
Nice review... although I can't see how you recommend the 540 over the 530. A quick check on NCIX shows a $25 CAD premium, for somewhere around an extra 200mhz. That's less than 5% higher overclocking clock speed for about 20% more money, and certainly less than 5% higher performance. Right?
From a value perspective, the i3-530 is of course better. But like I mentioned in the review, that 23X multiplier really is the sweet spot when you take into consideration Clarkdale's CPU frequency headroom and the BCLK capabilities of most LGA1156 motherboards. It eliminates any potential obstacle that would prevent you from really maxing out the processor. Now whether that is worth the premium depends on the person.

Quote:
I've used the 530 to build a few systems in the last couple of months... I'd be interested to see all of your BIOS settings for the overclock. It might be different chips, or different boards, but I've only been able to get around 4.1 GHZ with some boards/chips, with 4.4 GHZ on others. I guess I'm doing it right then... used the ASRock H55m, ASUS H55 EVO and Gigabyte H55m USB3... Also, I've been setting the QPI and Uncore frequencies low (as per Bloomfield), didn't realize you could bump these up. Should you start OCing like this, or raise them up after you've reached your target frequency?
So far I have tried three i3-540's and one i5-661 ES and they all did 4.55-4.70Ghz at 1.35V. It really hasn't required any special tweaking whatsoever. I set the vCore to 1.35V, the VTT/IMC to 1.35V, and the vDIMM to 1.65V, set the memory multiplier to 8X, disable C1E/EIST/C-State, and that's it.

I've never needed to touch the Uncore frequency, nor the QPI frequency since all the chips so far have been able to handle up to around 4.4-4.5Ghz QPI.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 07:00 PM
MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 261

My System Specs

Default

I did all the same things as you, but the highest I could get stable with the ASRock board and a 530 was 186 BCLK, which was 4092 MHZ... the other boards were BCLK stable to much higher than 200, although final clocks were stable at 4.4 on the ASUS and a little less on the Gigabyte I believe. Didn't really mess with them too much as they were just quick overclocks for friends... maybe it's the RAM, I should try running some higher timings, I bought some "Core i5" Corsair 7-8-7 1600 that was on sale, ran it at the specified timings. Probably could do much better with 9-9-9 timings... Thanks for the info MAC
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old May 3, 2010, 10:45 PM
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richmond B.C.
Posts: 94
Default

no doubt that the 530 is a con for the 540 but a review is a review
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old May 4, 2010, 03:51 AM
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
Default

Well as per my knowledge Core i3 540 and its little brother Core i3 530 lined up, but before we dig in I would strongly advise you to read some basics of Westmere architecture covered in Core i5 661 CPU. This will not go in depth on the Westmere architecture, but rather focus on the Core i3 540 and 530 as products.
__________________
ink cartridges
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i7-980X Gulftown Processor Review Comment Thread SKYMTL CPU's and Motherboards 103 September 23, 2010 02:21 PM
Comment Thread: A Summer Road Trip with the Intel Core i7 975 EE 3oh6 CPU's and Motherboards 19 June 11, 2009 11:00 AM
Intel X-25M 80GB SSD Review Comment Thread AkG Storage 45 March 6, 2009 07:40 PM
Intel Core i7 920, 940 & 965 EE Review Comment Thread MAC CPU's and Motherboards 67 January 27, 2009 07:00 PM