Hardware Canucks

Hardware Canucks (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/)
-   CPU's and Motherboards (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/cpus-motherboards/)
-   -   wPrime 2.0 32M/1024M Benchmark Competition (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/cpus-motherboards/17840-wprime-2-0-32m-1024m-benchmark-competition.html)

CMetaphor May 12, 2009 09:24 AM

wPrime - 32M/1024M Benchmark Competition
 
Hello one and all! In the vein of Finch's superpi mod 1.5 benchmark competition, I'm starting this thread as a comparison benchmark for those of us who care more for multi-threaded benchmarks and the relative performance of different single- and multi-cpu (but always multi-threaded) processors.

Rules/Requirements:

1 - Use wPrime which can be downloaded here:
wPrime Multithreaded Benchmark
2 - Run either the 32m or 1024m benchmark and post the results as following in your reply:

xx.xx Seconds - 32m
xxx.xx Seconds - 1024m

CPU: xxxxx @ x.xxGhz - x total cores/threads
Motherboard: xxxxxx
RAM: xxxxxx
3 - Post a completed 32m and/or 1024m screenshot with the completion time (click "view results" after completing either benchmark) along with a Minimum of one CPUz window open showing your processor information (for multiple cores/processors, multipl CPUz windows may be used) in your reply with the info from step 2.
Optional - Post additional CPUz screenshots of your motherboard and RAM specifications.

I will be creating a spreadsheet type database with all the results and updating post #2 with the results when I can. I'll also include any other graphs deemed important, such as performance/thread, performance/socket, price/performance, etc.

Competition is open to Any system that has at least two (2) threads!


Let the competition begin! :thumb:

Edit: Due to the limited number of multi-cpu systems on the forum, I'll allow multiple results from the same user, keeping the highest score for each multi-cpu system. :biggrin:

CMetaphor May 12, 2009 09:24 AM

RESULTS
 
32m Results:

Overall:
1.CMetaphor - 3.219 Seconds Link
2.3oh6 - 4.532 Seconds Link
3.Dead_things - 5.187 Seconds Link
4.Lionred - 5.23 Seconds Link
5.Sheepdogexpress - 5.241 Seconds Link
6.Chilly - 5.5 Seconds Link
7.MpG - 5.542 Seconds Link
8.DaleF - 5.946 Seconds Link
9.Somecanadianguy - 6.150 Seconds Link
10.Arinoth - 6.568 Seconds Link
11.Dwayne - 6.578 Seconds Link
12.Squeetard - 6.593 Seconds Link
13.Dead_Things - 7.128 Seconds Link
14.Gingerbee - 7.671 Seconds Link
15.Cowboy - 8.17 Seconds Link
16.DukeN - 8.517 Seconds Link
17.3.0Charlie - 8.67 Seconds Link
18.1Tanker - 8.735 Seconds Link
19.Kattivo - 8.984 Seconds Link
20.Twobombs - 9.547 Seconds Link
21.Superj - 10.249 Seconds Link
22.CanadaRox - 10.301 Seconds Link
23.Shayan288 - 10.527 Seconds Link
24.Kilauea - 10.717 Seconds Link
25.Prof. Dr. Silver - 11.061 Seconds Link
26.CMetaphor - 11.763 Seconds Link
27.Somecanadianguy - 14.493 Seconds Link


INTEL SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

Intel Xeon (45nm) / Pre-Nehalem Architecture (771)
1.DukeN - 8.517 Seconds Link
2.
3.

Intel Xeon (45nm) / Nehalem Architecture
1.3oh6 - 4.532 Seconds Link
2.Chilly - 5.5 Seconds Link
3.DaleF - 5.964 Seconds Link
4.3.0Charlie - 8.67 Seconds Link


Intel Core i5 (Lynnfield Desktop)
1.Dead_Things - 7.128 Seconds Link
2.
3.

Intel Core i7 (Nehalem Desktop)
1.Lionred - 5.23 Seconds Link
2.Sheepdogexpress - 5.241 Seconds Link
3.MpG - 5.542 Seconds Link
4.Somecanadianguy - 6.150 Seconds Link
5.Arinoth - 6.568 Seconds Link
6.Dwayne - 6.578 Seconds Link
7.Squeetard - 6.593 Seconds Link
8.Gingerbee - 7.671 Seconds Link


Intel Core 2 (45nm)
1.1Tanker - 8.735 Seconds Link
2.Kattivo - 8.984 Seconds Link
3.Superj - 10.249 Seconds Link
4.CanadaRox - 10.301 Seconds Link
5.Shayan288 - 10.527 Seconds Link
6.Prof. Dr. Silver 11.061 Seconds Link

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES (AMD)

AMD Opteron (65nm)
1.Dead_things - 5.187 Seconds Link
2.CMetaphor - 5.878 Seconds Link
3.Twobombs - 9.547 Seconds Link


AMD Opteron (45nm)
1.CMetaphor - 3.219 Seconds Link
2.
3.

AMD Phenom II (45nm)
1.Cowboy - 8.17 Seconds Link
2.Kilauea - 10.717 Seconds Link
3.CMetaphor - 11.763 Seconds Link
4.Somecanadianguy - 14.493 Seconds Link


1024m Results

Overall:
1.CMetaphor - 75.72 Seconds Link
2.Dead_things - 131.296 Seconds Link
3.3oh6 - 141.172 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post243328
4.DaleF - 160.162 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post208362
5.Chilly - 160.454 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post215461
6.MpG - 167.481 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post241708
7.Somecanadianguy - 192.94 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post198807
8.Arinoth - 201.949 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post247760
9.Dwayne - 203.612 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post244938
10.Squeetard - 204.695 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post230229
11.Gingerbee - 207.035 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post217915
12.Dead_Things - 215.606 Seconds Link
13. Twobombs - 247.25 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post225501
14.DukeN - 255.735 Seconds Link
15.3.0Charlie - 258.364 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post230208
16.CMetaphor - 272.812 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post193846
17.1Tanker - 283.313 Seconds Link
18.Kattivo - 304.31 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post241581
19.Superj - 323.611 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post217910
20.CanadaRox - 332.491 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post196057
21.Shayan288 - 333.339 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post243413
22. Kilauea - 337.023 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post234047
23.Prof. Dr. Silver - 371.328 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post217976
24.Somecanadianguy - 457 Seconds Link



INTEL SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

Intel Xeon (45nm) / Pre-Nehalem Architecture (771)
1.DukeN - 255.735 Seconds Link
2.
3.

Intel Xeon (45nm) / Nehalem Architecture
1.3oh6 - 141.172 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post243328
2.DaleF - 160.164 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post208362
3.Chilly - 160.454 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post215461
4.3.0Charlie - 258.364 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post230208
5.CMetaphor - 272.812 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post193846

Intel Core i5 (Lynnfield Desktop)
1.Dead_Things - 215.606 Seconds Link
2.
3.

Intel Core i7 (Nehalem Desktop)
1.MpG - 167.481 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post241708
2.Somecanadianguy - 192.94 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post198807
3.Dwayne - 203.612 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post244938
4.Squeetard - 204.695 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post230229
5.Gingerbee - 207.035 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post217915
6.Arinoth - 212.628 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post241668

Intel Core 2 (45nm)
1.1Tanker - 283.313 Seconds Link
2.Kattivo - 304.31 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post241581
3.Superj - 323.611 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post217910
4.CanadaRox - 332.491 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post196057
5.Shayan288 - 333.339 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post243413
6.Prof. Dr. Silver - 371.328 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post217976

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES (AMD)

AMD Opteron (65nm)
1.Dead_things - 131.296 Seconds Link
2.CMetaphor - 137.727 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post195421
3. Twobombs - 247.25 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post225501


AMD Opteron (45nm)
1.CMetaphor - 75.72 Seconds Link
2.
3.

AMD Phenom II (45nm)
1.Kilauea - 337.023 Seconds http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...tml#post234047
2.Somecanadianguy - 457 Seconds Link
3.

CMetaphor May 12, 2009 11:45 AM

43.114 Seconds - 32m
1342.281 Seconds - 1024m


CPU: Intel Xeon (Prestonia Core) @ 3.06Ghz - 2 CPUs / 4 Logical Cores (Hyperthreading)
Motherboard: Supermicro X5DA8
RAM: DDR-3200 - 3Gb

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...9c373a2605.jpg

CMetaphor May 12, 2009 12:22 PM

9.062 Seconds - 32m
272.812 Seconds - 1024m

Intel Xeon w3540 @ 2.93Ghz - 4 Cores/ 8 Threads
Supermicro X8STi
6gb Kingston DDR3-1066

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...9cbc206bb2.jpg

:shok: Faaaaast Nehalem!

CMetaphor May 14, 2009 09:36 PM

7.332 Seconds - 32m
152.241 Seconds - 1024m

Behemoth-XVI
AMD Opteron 8354 @ 2.2Ghz x 4 - 16 Cores
Supermicro H8QM3-2
Kingston DDR2-800 ECC Reg - 8Gigs.


http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...e-behemoth.jpg

CanadaRox May 16, 2009 11:03 AM

I'm running it on my desktop right now (3.87GHz QX9650). Definitely going to be poor times for the clock speed as my Vista is an old install with all sorts of crap I'm too lazy to remove. Hopefully I'll bother to get back up to 4.2GHz and reinstall Vista. Results coming soon.....

Here we go:

32M: 10.301s
1024M: 332.491s

QX9650 @ 3870MHz
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
2x2GB Dominators @ 1032MHz, 5-5-5-15

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/2...appywprime.jpg

I hope my non-Xeon/Opteron didn't break your ranking system.

Also, maybe make it more clear that you don't have to have a mutli-cpu/workstation/server to post here as it is just a benchmark thread, as I happen to know one member who is afraid someone will point out he only has one cpu (though it is actually a Xeon!)

somecanadianguy May 21, 2009 03:49 PM

no i7's allowed?

CanadaRox May 21, 2009 06:14 PM

I think any processor should be allowed since this thread is as much overclocking related as it is multi-core related.

CMetaphor May 21, 2009 07:16 PM

Thread updated! Thanks for posting a score CanadaRox! Let's hope this spurs more members into joining this friendly competition in order to give us all a better idea oh what kind of systems are trult optimized for multi-threaded use. :thumb:

CanadaRox May 22, 2009 05:09 AM

My processor is a QX9650 by the way, not i7. Great to see this thread getting updated though.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:30 AM.