Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > CPU's and Motherboards
Reload this Page wPrime 2.0 32M/1024M Benchmark Competition
Mark Forums Read
Media Gallery Register Members List LAN Calendar Search Today's Posts

    
Reply
Page 3 of 16 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old May 29, 2009, 06:58 AM
CMetaphor's Avatar
Quadfather
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,983

My System Specs

Default
Teehee!! Behemoths 16 cores of 18-month old architecture still hold the 1024m crown! /Taunt

Cmon people! lets push HwC higher up on the Hwbot.org charts!

Our current hwbot rankings:
Rank

Worldwide Rank: #95 of 809 Country Rank: #3 of 6 in Canada
__________________
"Backed by common sense and physics!" -Squeetard
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old May 29, 2009, 12:55 PM
MpG's Avatar
MpG MpG is offline
Hall Of Fame
  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 3,136
Default
Heh, I'm working on it. I'm below 200sec now, but haven't got the water up and running yet.
__________________
i7 2600K | ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z | 580GTX | Corsair DDR3-2133
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old May 29, 2009, 01:17 PM
CMetaphor's Avatar
Quadfather
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,983

My System Specs

Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by MpG View Post
Heh, I'm working on it. I'm below 200sec now, but haven't got the water up and running yet.
Bring it! Not only is it a fun and friendly competition amongst HwC, but it'll help our Hwbot team scores! No downside!
__________________
"Backed by common sense and physics!" -Squeetard
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old June 10, 2009, 10:14 PM
CMetaphor's Avatar
Quadfather
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,983

My System Specs

Default
I just though I'd try and push the competitive spirit a little more.

After some tweaks:
32m - 6.679 Seconds
1024m - 137.727 Seconds

Behemoth. Need I say more?
__________________
"Backed by common sense and physics!" -Squeetard
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old June 10, 2009, 11:10 PM
Chos3n's Avatar
Allstar
F@H
  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rigaud,QC
Posts: 745
Default
Where are those Istanbul CPU already? 16 Cores is SOOO 2008. Now everyone runs on 24 Cores system
__________________
System | Ragnarok
Case Antec 900
PSU Corsair TX750W
CPU Intel Core i7 2700K 3.5GHZ
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V
Memory Corsair Vengeance Blue 8GB 2X4GB DDR3-1600 CL9-9-9-24
Video Card MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II
Sound Card ASUS Xonar DX
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old June 11, 2009, 12:50 AM
MpG's Avatar
MpG MpG is offline
Hall Of Fame
  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 3,136
Default
Urgh, seriously, one delay after another with my ing water plans. So here's my air entry. It's actually part of my stability testing, but the necessary stuff is all there. A little blurry from the resizing, but I think it legible.

32M best: 6.051sec
1024M best: 184.517sec
Name: 220BCLK-HPi&3DM6&WPrime(Resized).jpg Views: 543 Size: 90.9 KB
__________________
i7 2600K | ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z | 580GTX | Corsair DDR3-2133
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old June 11, 2009, 06:12 AM
CMetaphor's Avatar
Quadfather
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,983

My System Specs

Default
Updated!

Some nice 32m numbers there!
__________________
"Backed by common sense and physics!" -Squeetard
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old June 11, 2009, 07:17 AM
CanadaRox's Avatar
Allstar
F@H
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scarborough (Toronto)
Posts: 614
Default
That version is also 1.55. I don't know how they compare exactly but I do know a few versions run much faster than others. I'm pretty sure they designed 2.00 to be about the same speed as 1.55 for modern hardware.
__________________
Project: Black and White
i7 920 D0 | 3 x 2GB DDR3 | EVGA X58 SLI LE
XFX 4890 | Corsair HX750 | Corsair Obsidian
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old June 11, 2009, 08:45 AM
MpG's Avatar
MpG MpG is offline
Hall Of Fame
  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 3,136
Default
They're pretty close, but I've been finding version 2.00 to be consistently slightly faster on 32M, and about a whole 2 seconds faster on 1024M.
__________________
i7 2600K | ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z | 580GTX | Corsair DDR3-2133
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old June 11, 2009, 09:27 AM
CMetaphor's Avatar
Quadfather
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,983

My System Specs

Default
I accepted the 1.55 result just cause im getting so few results... disappointing.
__________________
"Backed by common sense and physics!" -Squeetard
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 16 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > Last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superpi 32m Benchmark Competition Slaughter Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 95 February 8, 2014 03:02 PM
Superpi 1m Benchmark Competition Slaughter Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 305 February 8, 2014 03:01 PM
wPrime Benchmark v1.58 Prof. Dr. Silver Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 5 February 5, 2008 12:55 PM
Worst Comapanies in America 2007 Competition: Consumerist Babrbarossa Off Topic 4 March 20, 2007 03:07 PM
AMD offer 1/4 mill prize for architectural design competition Babrbarossa Off Topic 1 March 12, 2007 02:33 PM