thanks guys, i am really liking this board too. i also love the EVGA X58-SLI, so the next comment might be a bit surprising.
Quote:
Originally Posted by encorp The question is now: this or the EVGA? I muuust order this week; I'm sick of my chip sitting here haha |
i have received this question a lot with folks knowing i have both. for benching purposes, i personally would choose the DFI if someone walked into my place right now with a gun and said "we are taking the EVGA or the DFI...you choose". i think the EVGA may be quicker at 32M with the memory timing options available that the DFI doesn't have, but with that said, i still think the DFI is a better choice.
now, for 24/7 users...again i would have to recommend the DFI. throughout testing, the board has been flawless. there aren't as many reboot issues with random hangs on otherwise stable setups like i get with the EVGA once in a while. the DFI seems to be more consistent day to day. it feels like it clocks memory better and can handle higher clocks despite the lack of memory timing options. and it is as easy, if not easier, to get clocking at 200 BCLK. the EVGA is dead simple to clock as well and perhaps i feel this way because i was expecting a battle as with any DFI, but you literally just have to set CPU/memory ratios, up VTT to whatever is necessary for your uncore/memory clocks and vCORE for the CPU. all other voltages have been on the lowest default since i got the board.
one set back, as mentioned in the review and outlined in the thermal testing, is that you will want to have some sort of air blowing on the whole heat sink assembly. perhaps an exhaust fan sitting right above the I/O panel of your case will do the trick, but some sort of active cooling going over the memory helping the chipset out as well is ideal. the thermal testing section numbers are not fabricated, the PWM is a night and day difference without a little bit of air...and it doesn't take much to help a lot.
i also wish i had a better audio setup and knowledge in that aspect so i could comment on the audio, but for me, there isn't a lick of difference between the EVGA onboard and the DFI. again, that is likely a result of my ignorant ears and equally poor audio setup.
both boards provide room for the TRUE in both directions with identical drawbacks of overhang and first memory slot interference in specific directions. so no worries about the TRUE, fits like a glove no matter how you want to mount it...but it does overhang the top edge of the board when exhausting out the rear of the case.
the layouts are identical (and the best so far of any board IMO) aside from the PCI-E 1X (EVGA) vs PCI-E 4X (DFI) and the fact that the DFI has the two 16X slots when two cards are being used split up for dual slot coolers, but the testing we did in the EVGA review seemed to nullify any losses in PCI-E bandwidth anyway. i might repeat that testing with the GTX 295 now that i have it.
i think i have covered everything that pops to mind comparing the two boards but don't hesitate to ask anymore specific questions about the two. sorry for the essay, but more info is better than less