View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old September 25, 2017, 06:37 AM
Lysrin's Avatar
Lysrin Lysrin is offline
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,625

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagath View Post
The Ďforum postsí thing isnt replies to the article. Itís the way the review and our forum somehow come up with pages in the article.

Itís strange I know but Iím not privy to the exact workings behind the scenes between the review side of the site, and the interface with the forums.
Ah OK thanks for that Sagath. I didn't realise that was what was happening there. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything. I'm thinking this article may generate a decent amount of discussion or at least fireballs to throw at Intel for the price!

SKYMTL makes the comment in conclusion that gamers should avoid this and similar high core count CPUs. I can certainly agree with that given the price. But isn't there any chance that we should be getting ready for games that want more cores? Star Citizen has stated that they will take advantage of up to 16 cores in the future. Single case I guess, but how far away from that being more the norm are we, and I guess are we far enough away right now that even Threadripper for the price doesn't make sense... yet?

I just wonder about it because my gaming PC is lasting many more years than it did in the old days. i7 920 system was chugging along for 5 years and was still decent when I upgraded to 4790K, I just wanted to upgrade! So if that is the case, is there an argument for getting more cores? Maybe there is but the argument for Coffee Lake or similar with their 6-8 physical cores really is the more reasonable next step, as SKYMTL pointed out.
Reply With Quote