View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 21, 2013, 07:13 AM
great_big_abyss's Avatar
great_big_abyss great_big_abyss is offline
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,210

My System Specs

Default

I don't see it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by supaflyx3 View Post
Rather disappointing.
And, I don't think so. Rather, it's exactly where I expected it to be, given it's raw specs. Midway between a GTX680 and a GTX690 is nothing to sneeze at, especially when you consider that it's a single GPU card. Is the $1000 price tag justified? Probably not. It has $700-$800 worth of performance, at best. BUT, Nvidia is performing in a niche here, and they're the only player. So they can effectively charge what they want. And lots of people will pay to have the name 'Titan' in their system.

And to think that this was originally slated to become the original GTX680. My God!

Also, I like your graphs. Especially the Frame Time Testing. It shows that while the GTX690 may have the highest FPS, it delivers less 'clean' frames than Titan.
__________________



HTPC: Z77A-G45; 3770K; Coolermaster GeminII; 2x4GB Kingston HyperX 1600Mhz; MSI R7-260X; 2x 128GB Crucial M4 SSD; 1TB WD Green, 2x 2TB WD Green; PC P&C 750W PS; Fractal Design Node 605;
Son's Rig: M5A97; 1055T; CNPS20LQ; 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz; ASUS GTX650Ti Boost; 80GB Intel 520 SSD; 320GB WD Black HDD; SPI 700W; Bitfenix Shinobi;

Last edited by great_big_abyss; February 21, 2013 at 07:28 AM.
Reply With Quote