Folding time. Finally?
View Single Post
February 5, 2013, 11:09 AM
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Centre of the Universe
My System Specs
Originally Posted by
cant even make it properly scare above 16 threads without the use of VM
Actually fah scales extremely efficiently - even on Windows. Up to 64 threads, that is. Now 10 years after 2003 x64 was released, 64 is still the max thread count per processor group on Windows. Honestly, if not for legacy applications, I can't think of a single reason for maintaining a Windows server. But that's another story...
In terms of efficiency, scaling is in the 95%+ range up to about 256 logical processors. Current fahcores struggle with processor counts over 256, but that is only a theoretical problem at this point. The Xeon Phi at 240 threads is as close as current single-node hardware comes to encountering fah's efficiency ceiling.
The main reason why Linux is preferred over Windows is because of the availability of bigadv units. Otherwise, regular SMP units are almost as fast on Windows as they are on Linux (up to 64 threads).
Think you can overclock? Then show us what you got!
Hardware Canucks Overclocking team
Follow my benching, folding, mining and miscellaneous shenanigans
My System Specs
EVGA X79 FTW
Intel Core i7 4820k
4 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-2400
GALAX GTX 970
Vertex 3 MaxIOPS 240GB + Vertex 3 120GB + 2 x Hitachi 1TB mech drives for storage
Antec HCP 1300 Platinum
Coolermaster ATCS 840
Samsung U28D590D + BenQ V2400W
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dead Things
Find all posts by Dead Things