View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 9, 2012, 04:24 PM
Generic User #2 Generic User #2 is offline
Allstar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 561
Default

the chrome adoption scheme is pretty straight forward. Chrome is advertised based on very user-noticable features, primarily speed.

imo, firefox adoption (pre-chrome) was a little...odd. FF simply wasn't advertised. the tech support route definitely makes sense though (especially since I've done it...)

EDIT:

i dunno, i find adobe reader x to be pretty pleasant to use. older versions were WAYYYY too slow; the difference between legacy AR and ARX is greater than the difference betwwen 3.6 FF and modern FF.
Reply With Quote