View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old November 4, 2012, 07:44 PM
Generic User #2 Generic User #2 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 561

Originally Posted by Galcobar View Post
That assumes MS contracts a more reliable factory to assemble the hardware than the factories other companies have contracted to assemble their hardware.
I think he's referring to software performance, not build quality. if you're talking about HP 'software assistance products.'

if you're talking about the insertion of malware at the production question is: who cares?

users are going to get infected when they use their computer regularly.

Originally Posted by b1lk1 View Post
Building your own PC, in my mind, is the safest way to own/operate a PC.
are you suggesting we use linux? because Windows and OS X are pretty closed-source. You don't ACTUALLY know that it's not tracking you.
Reply With Quote