View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old October 15, 2012, 08:41 AM
Bond007 Bond007 is offline
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,620

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfielder View Post
One thing to remember - the GTS 650 and GTS 660 has smaller pipelines to the memory than the GTS 560. Faster memory clock, but narrower pipe. They look good on paper, but.....

GTS 650 and GTX 660 are 192bits vs 256 bits, or even 320 bits for some GTX 5xx cards. I am not sure what the GTX 4xx or GTX 2xx series used.

For this reason, I am looking to get a GTS 560 or GTX 570, rather than a GTX 650 or 660. For some applications, the key is the amount of data they can move to memory at once, not how fast the memory transfer is.
Partly true. But a narrower bus with faster memory can be equal to a wider bus with slower memory
__________________
Desktop: Antec Three Hundred, Gigabyte Z77-D3H, i5 3570K with Zalman Optima Cooler, Corsair Vengeance 2x4gb 1600mhz, MSI Cyclone GTX 460, Seasonic S12II 500W, WD Black 1TB, Intel 530 120GB
Away from home light Gamer: Acer Aspire 15.6", A8-3500m undervolt and OC to 2Ghz, 2x4gb Corsair Vengeance, Crucial M500 240gb
Reply With Quote