Corsair Accelerator 60GB SSD Cache Drive Review Comment Thread
View Single Post
May 17, 2012, 10:00 PM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond, B.C.
My System Specs
One suggestion I might make in regards to the review is to identify why the SF-2100 series of controllers is less capable than the SF-2200 series in the introductory page.
I am left wondering about the conclusion stated on almost every testing page that the difference between the two drives is due to using a SATAII controller. The 64GB OCZ Synapse uses 16 NAND chips, according to the earlier HWC review. That would mean all eight channels are populated with two devices per channel, allowing for interleaving. The 64GB Accelerator is described as using eight modules, with the part number indicating they're 64Gb packages, with the 10th letter being B, indicating one die per module.
Thus the Synapse has 16 devices to the Accelerator's eight -- that would mean no interleaving could occur on the Accelerator. Given almost all of the reads and writes are done well below the SATAII limit, would the difference in number of NAND devices -- and subsequent limitation on interleaving -- not be at least as likely to be the source of the small performance discrepancy seen under the synthetic tests?
Also, typo at the bottom of page 3 (SF-2182), and second sentence/second paragraph on page 11 (Unlike the competition, Corsairís implementation uses SATA 2 rather than SATA 3and relies upon a lower-performance controller).
Last edited by Galcobar; May 18, 2012 at
My System Specs
ASUS P5N-E SLI
Intel E6600 2.4GHz (3.2)
Patriot Extreme 2x1GB 4-4-4-12
MSI GTX 480 (OC to 797/1594, 2000)
Crucial m4 64GB Seagate 7200.10 320GB
PC Power & Cooling 910S
Antec Sonata II
Samsung Syncmaster P2370HD
W7 Pro 64
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Galcobar
Find all posts by Galcobar