F@H Core 16: Taking AMD GPU Folding to the Next Level?
View Single Post
April 12, 2011, 10:25 PM
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Centre of the Universe
My System Specs
Thanks for the write-up SKY! A thorough assessment. If the project maturation for OpenCL units turns out to be anything like that for CUDA, then later, larger projects will likely yield even greater dividends for cards with more stream processors as opposed to those with higher clock frequencies.
Given the resource requirements for AMD-based projects, it behooves Stanford to figure out a way to park the data in VRAM rather than rely on swaps with the system memory. User-added environment variables could partially do this with Brook. I really don't see any reason why Stanford can't do it completely with OpenCL. Certainly, in the current bigadv era, this advancement is too-little-too-late for dedicated folders and should be understood as an improvement for regular users. And regular users don't mess around with environment variables. As you said - a good first step. But there remains much to improve for AMD folders.
Think you can overclock? Then show us what you got!
Hardware Canucks Overclocking team
Follow my benching, folding, mining and miscellaneous shenanigans
My System Specs
EVGA X79 FTW
Intel Core i7 4820k
4 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-2400
GALAX GTX 970
Vertex 3 MaxIOPS 240GB + Vertex 3 120GB + 2 x Hitachi 1TB mech drives for storage
Antec HCP 1300 Platinum
Coolermaster ATCS 840
Samsung U28D590D + BenQ V2400W
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dead Things
Find all posts by Dead Things