Does SATA III in RAID 0 (on non-SSD) out performing SATA II in RAID 0 (on non-SSD)?
View Single Post
July 4, 2010, 09:40 PM
Join Date: May 2010
My System Specs
Originally Posted by
Well I am mostly concerned with performance, I have a 1TB hard drive that I'll be using for backups. So a one 2TB hard drive will out perform two 1.5TB in a RAID 0 array?
If Gaming is your primary performance concern, then RAID0 will provide almost no benefit. You should get near 2x the read/write speeds, but your RATs will barely change. For gaming, this will mean almost nothing. Remember that once you are in a game, the HDD does almost nothing. The CPU, RAM, and GPU handle all the heavy work.
Check out this toms hardware test.
They basically gained 0.2 - 0.8 FPS by going to RAID0. Now considering that the 2TB is faster than the 1.5s, the difference will be even less. I would not call .5 FPS worth cutting HDD reliability in half. RAID0 will also use up a little bit of CPU power as well (very little).
I would personally recommend going with a single 2TB drive over 1.5TB RAID0.
Or, better yet, like supafly says, get a small SSD and a 2tb drive and you will have the best performance. The SSDs have such significantly smaller RATs that you will be able to see a difference in loadtimes of apps and games.
My System Specs
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme -- EK Waterblock
3930K @ 4.5Ghz -- EK Supreme HF Waterblock
32GB Corsair Vengance 2133 Quad Channel
GTX 680 SC Signature -- EK waterblock
Samsung 830 256gb | OCZ Agility 3 360gb | 2x 4TB WD Red (Raid 1)
Corsair 800d (1x320, 1x240 rads) dual 655s
ASUS Xonar Essence STX
2 X LG BH10LS30 BluRay writers
Samsung 275t + Asus PA238QR
Windows 7 64bit
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dustin1706
Find all posts by dustin1706