View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old January 5, 2009, 09:57 PM
miggs78 miggs78 is offline
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,184
Default

Well very nice and detailed review as always. Even though it performs slightly better than the 65nm version, I don't think it is worth the extra penny, the power consumption is only 11 watts less and the temps are higher than the 65nm version..

Oh and SKY...

Quote:
Applications Used:

Call of Duty: World at War
Crysis: Warhead
X3: Terran Conflict
Dead Space
Left 4 Dead
Far Cry 2
Fallout 3
Need for Speed Underclover
Sorry to say this SKY, I caught a spelling mistake ..

All in all, very nicely covered review
__________________
Intel E8400, Biostar TPower i45
G-Skill PC2-8500 4GB, Saphire HD4870 512mb
Cooler Master HAF 932, Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W
Samsung 931BW 19" LCD, Logitech MX Revolution
Reply With Quote